Supreme Court – NHRC 17-10-2003

17, Oct 2003

W.P(Crl.)No. 109 OF 2003

 

ITEM No.301           Court No. 1           SECTION PIL

 

 

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

 

Writ Petition(Crl.) No. 109/2003( For Preliminary Hearing )

 

NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION         Petitioner (s)

 

VERSUS

 

STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.                   Respondent (s)

 

( With Appln(s). for intervention. and exemption from filing O.T. and intervention and office report)

With

 

T.P.(Crl.) No.194-202/2003 (for prel. hearing) (National Human Rights Commission vs. State of Gujarat & ors.) (with appln.(s) for stay and exemption from filing copies of FIR

and impleading party and office report),

W.P(Crl.)No.D17953/2003 (for prel. hearing) (Umed Singh Gulia vs. Union of India & Anr.) (with office report),

SLP(Crl.)No.3770/2003 (for prel. hearing) (Citizens for Justice & Peace & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.) (with appln.(s) for filing addl. facts and documents and directions and permission to place addl. documents on record),

SLP(C) No. 7951/2002 (for prel. hearing) (Viraj Tra Desai vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.) (with appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/cof the impugned judgment and permission to place addl.on record) and

WP(Crl.) Nos. 11-15 (Aleque Padamsee & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.) (with appln.(s)

for permission to submit additional documents and directions and office report)

 

Date : 17/10/2003 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

 

 

CORAM :

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.B. SINHA

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE AR. LAKSHMANAN

 

Amicus Curiae       Mr. Harish N Salve, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Bhargava V Desai, Adv.

Ms. Aparjita Singh, Adv.

 

For Petitioner (s)

in WP 109 &        Mr. P P Rao, Sr. Adv.

TP 194-202         Mr. T R Andhyarujina, Sr. Adv.

Mr. S. Muralidhar,Adv.

Mr. Somiran Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Rajat Khosla, Adv.

Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.

 

in WPD17953        In person.

 

in SLP 3770        Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Mihir Desai, Adv.

Ms. Aparna Bhat, Adv.

Mr. P Ramesh Kumar, Adv.

 

in SLP 7951         M/s. J S Wad & Co., Advs.(NP)

 

in WP(Crl.) 11-15   Ms. Aparna Bhat, Adv.

Mr. Mihir Desai, Adv.

Mr. P Ramesh Kumar, Adv.

 

For Respondent (s)

Union of India      Mr. Soli J Sorabjee, Attorney General

Mr. Raju Ramachandran, ASG

Mr. A Mariarputham, Adv.

Mr. Prateek Jalan, Adv.

Ms. Sushma Suri, Adv.

 

State of Gujarat    Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, ASG

Mr. P S Mishra, Sr. Adv.

Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv.

Mr. Tathagat H Vardhan, Adv.

Ms. Swarupa Reddy, Adv.

Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Amitesh C Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Dhruv Kumar Jha, Adv.

 

R.Nos.2-22 in       Mr. K T S Tulasi, Sr. Adv.

SLP 3770            Mr. Lalit Chauhan, Adv.

Mr. Sameer Parekh, Adv.

for M/s. P H Parekh & Co., Advs.

 

in WP(Crl.)11-15    Mr. Ravindra K Adsure, Adv.

Mr. V N Raghupathy, Adv. (NP)

 

 

For Petitioner (s)

in intervention/

impleadment petns

in WP 109.         Mr. P S Mishra, Sr. Adv.

Mr. C D Singh, Adv.

Mr. Tathagat H Vardhan, Adv.

 

Dr. Nafis A Siddiqui, Adv.

 

in TP 194-202       Mr. Mihir Desai, Adv.

Ms. Aparna Bhat, Adv.

Mr. P Ramesh Kumar, Adv.

 

 

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

ORDER

 

 

In SLP(Crl.) No. 3770/2003, the petitioners have annexed an affidavit dated 15.10.2003 of petitioner No. 2 Teesta Atul Setalvad with Crl.M.P. No. 9351/2003 (page 196 of the paperbook) and have also filed in Court today another affidavit dated 17.10.2003 of petitioner No. 2. The affidavit dated 17.10.2003 be taken on record. Learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the State of Gujarat prays for and is allowed time till 31st October, 2003 to file a response to the said affidavit dated 15.10.2003 and to para 7 of the affidavit dated 17.10.2003.   Rejoinder thereto may be filed by the next date of hearing.

 

From the record, we find that the criminal appeal filed before the High Court has been amended and the amended appeal has been admitted and is posted for hearing on 1st December, 2003. We also find that the notices issued have also been served and the paperbooks as directed by the Court will be made ready. We hope that the hearing of the appeal will commence on 1st December, 2003 and the matter will be decided expeditiously. The State of Gujarat shall continue to inform this Court as also the learned Amicus Curiae about the development of the prosecution of the appeal. At present, no further order is required to be passed.

 

However, we may clarify that we have not expressed any opinion or made any observation as regards the merits of the criminal appeal pending in the High Court. In case any observation has been made by this Court, that will not come in the way of the High Court in deciding the appeal on merits.

 

Learned Amicus Curiae has submitted today a Note before this Court.   The State of Gujarat shall also file a response to the said Note by 31st October, 2003.

 

The State of Gujarat shall submit a Status Report and the list of witnesses in the other nine cases, a copy of which shall also be given to the learned Amicus Curiae, in a sealed cover.

 

List all these matters on 7th November, 2003.

 

 

(D.P. WALIA)             (JANKI BHATIA)

COURT MASTER              COURT MASTER

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Go to Top
Nafrat Ka Naqsha 2023