Menu

Citizens for Justice and Peace

Shekhar Gupta omits role of Hindutva forces in Bombay violence while criticising Sanju The Print

07, Jul 2018 | Teesta Setalvad

His hypocrisy has not just crept into the Indian political marketplace, but has been legitimised by policy makers and journalists.

Many things went seriously wrong with India’s polity and governance during that dark winter of December 1992-January 1993, and the March 12 serial blasts, which killed close to 250 people, were the final diabolical culmination.

Evil, sinister and diabolical are words that have come to represent the ISI. Words easily used even by Shekhar Gupta in his diatribe against the latest Sanju biopic that has, like many before it, cherry-picked one part of a gory sequence of events. Words that conjure outrage and betrayal with reference to 12 March 1993.

In contrast, the few and casual sounding phrases like ‘riots’ and ‘timeline’ confine, the equally if not more sinister and systemic, whipping up of neighbourhood terror backed by police collusion (can we dare term this ‘khaki’ terror?) to the dustbins of amnesiac history.

In his latest avatar as editor of ThePrint, Gupta upholds this one-sided, myopic outrage against bomb terror while conveniently (for the establishment) turning his eye away from India’s dark underbelly. This accepted hypocrisy has not just crept into the Indian political marketplace but has been legitimised, time and again, by policy makers, journalists and the like. So, while the serial blasts of 12 March, with the Dawood-Tiger Memon plot and the AK-47s, grenades and RDX, conjure up horror and anger in the righteous Gupta, the carefully crafted bloodthirst of the Bombay mob –incited and led allegedly by Shiv Sena (SS) chief Bal Thackeray’s rantings in Saamna – that reportedly took over 1,100 lives and tore apart the fabric of India’s urbs prima is just not accepted as a definition of terror.

Which is why the Justice B.N. Srikrishna report on those dark days is, in today’s India, considered passé, even by online news portals.

Because, the report meticulously documents the gory build-up to India’s first concentrated betrayal of itself as a nation, when in full public view, with 3,000 paramilitary forces watching (and yes, Sharad Pawar, then India’s defence minister is known to have the videos to prove it!), a place of religious worship was demolished, breaking Indian law, violating the Constitution and legitimising the criminals (who thereafter rose to become deputy prime minister, home minister and education minister, sic!). 

Bombay burned twice, first in December 1992 and then again in January 1993. While the dastardly killing of the ‘Hindu’ Mathadi workers (isn’t it ironical that while we use identity markers for the Mathadis or for the Radhabai Chawl inmates, we have relegated the Muslims burned alive in a Maruti at Antop Hill, or the young Muslim thrown into the mob and lynched by a cop, to just numbers?) was one of the proverbial sparks for the communal conflagration, it was not what started the violence.

Who Cast the First Stone is an important tool that journalists covering all kinds of conflict need to understand, calibrate, ponder over and develop. Gupta is no exception. Within hours of the Babri Masjid being razed – and yes, the memory of that event does sends a chill down our spine!!—victory processions were believed to have been allowed in Dharavi, Pydhonie and other parts of Mumbai by sections of the Mumbai Police. ‘Angry Muslims’, Mr. Gupta, were not the first to burst out into Mumbai’s streets.

The spark that consumed Mumbai was lit by the Hindutvawaadis, and a supine (or soft communal) Congress leadership in Maharashtra (chief minister Sudhakarrao Naik carries the blame for allowing the Shiv Sena to ‘literally get away with murder’) will historically carry the blame. Veteran trade unionist Sharad Rao’s press conference of 7 December 1992 exposed and listed dozens of persons allegedly killed by the Mumbai police’s bullets – overwhelmingly, the targets were the city’s Muslims. Women and children in their homes were not spared in this incomprehensible police behaviour.

Remember this:

Justice Srikrishna Point 2.4, Volume 1, Chapter 1 : From or about July 1992, the Bharatiya Janata Party orchestrated its campaign for a construction of a temple at Ayodhya by holding Ram Paduka processions, chowk sabhas  and meetings… Not only were these occasions used for exhorting Hindus to unite, but some speeches and slogans on such occasions were downright communal, warning Muslims that dissent on the Ram Janmabhoomi dispute would be an act of treachery… Though ostensibly religious, the Ram Paduka processions had less of religion and more of politics.

Which is why the BJP-SS called mahaartis (Chapter 2 of the Report) – a despicable communal roadside mobilisation that was used by the SS-BJP’s saffron shirts to reportedly target minority homes and properties – were singled out for condemnation by Justice Srikrishna. Which is why the list of policemen found guilty of criminal misconduct (and liable for punishment and prosecution for allowing murder on their watch) never really paid for their crimes.

Collectively, the regimes that came to power after 1999 (when the SS-BJP alliance was voted out) simply did not care for institutional course-correction. Which is why even S.K. Bapat, police commissioner of Mumbai during those dark days, failed, and failed miserably at even attempting to curb the targeted and perpetrated violence against Mumbai’s minorities.

If AK rifles, grenades and RDX were used for the shocking and murderous serial bomb blasts on 12 March, it was fireballs of kerosene, swords and trishuls that generated neighbourhood terror for six days in December 1992 and several weeks in January 1993. The Mumbai Police, which was until then acknowledged as a professional force, came under a cloud for its deeply partisan behaviour.

While top policeman quoted by Gupta speak of the bomb blast plot and the ISI’s subsequent designs, other top policemen who served and saw this city burn, Julio Ribeiro, Satish Sahney, V.N. Deshmukh and Sanjay Pandey (to just name a few) worked hard to repair the loss of faith in the police that this corrosive bias had caused.

Deshmukh’s testimony before the Srikrishna Commission candidly speaks of the dire tendency of the cadres of the Hindutva right (the Shiv Sena and the RSS) being hired within the ranks of the Maharashtra/Mumbai police. This journalist had taped wireless messages, reflecting interjections to control room conversations, which showed a more than worrisome bias in police behaviour.

And what about the role of journalists, Gupta’s piteous whipping boys? Some of us, on the field, saw and reported on the bloodthirst of both the mob and the bomb. Some of us stuck to the story for years after the fires had died down, tirelessly scripting the chronology of events as it took place.

In between, the silver screen saw Mani Ratnam’s Bombay and Anurag Kashyap’s Black Friday – long before this latest biopic got Gupta so worked up – selectively portray a particular narrative or even offer moral equivalence. None so far has had the guts to tell it as it is: That India and Mumbai burned in the fire of the Ramjanmabhoomi movement, which led to the Babri Masjid demolition on 6 December 1992. And that these fires are still being cynically ignited.

Read the original column by Shekhar Gupta here.

 

The complete article may be read here.

 

1 Comment

  1. This man is a obvious establishment hack, but some how escape the criticism of supposed liberal left. Kudos to you for exposing his hand-waving sophistry. this Great piece on bigoted centrist and self-styled geopolitical expert.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Go to Top