Citizens for Justice and Peace

Indian TV Media’s Silence on Human Rights Abuse An Exclusive Blog by Special Invitation

26, Nov 2017 | Rajdeep Sardesai

We are on a public stage at a high profile lit fest in the pristine and exclusive Delhi Gymkhana, home to the country’s ruling elite when an elderly gent gets up and harangues me: ‘I have been listening to you talk for the last half hour, you talk like an anti-national, we should throw you out from here!’ I have just been speaking on the need to revive the dialogue in Kashmir with all stakeholders and voiced my concern over stone-throwing and the growing distancing of  the ‘aam aadmi’ in the valley from the political leadership. The organisers manage to control the situation before it gets ugly. My critic turns out to a retired senior army officer, a proud  and honourable Indian citizen but one whose worldview has no time or mindspace to listen to any talk of  human rights violations in the Valley.

Those who advocate for human rights in conflict zones have always been targeted as ‘bleeding heart jholawallahs’. Now, a new word has been added to the divisive lexicon: ‘anti-national’. In an increasingly politically polarized climate, the narrative over human rights is now shaped in a toxic and frenzied manner that allows little space for a reasonable dialogue. When voicing concern over children who are being blinded by pellet guns is seen as treasonous, then it makes it very difficult to have any kind of engagement. The loud ‘nationalistic’ argument seeks to drown out all other voices, often shooting from the shoulders of  anonymous men in uniform. Which is why when a Kashmiri is tied to a jeep and paraded  in the street, no one is expected to question the army major who has taken the contentious call that is a blatant violation of  human rights.

It is precisely this veil of silence that must  be lifted: a strong nation must have the resilience and the capacity to confront inconvenient truths. These truths do not remain confined to just the Kashmir valley which, in a sense, remains the most visible symbol of the failure of  the Indian state to find a human and just resolution to the anguish of  its citizenry. But the 70 years of  Indian independence are littered with instances where our republican
constitution has failed its people, where the rights and freedoms enshrined in our ‘holy book’ have been violated with impunity. In how many instances of  riots and massacres in this country have we provided justice or  any sense of  closure to the victims of  targeted violence? Then, be it atrocities against women, Dalits, tribals, minorities, farmers, the poor and the landless, how often has the Indian state stood firmly with the victim?

We in the media, especially TV media, have been just as culpable. In the whirl of TRPs, how much air-time do we give to issues like farmer suicides or labour unrest? Does a farmer who is being exploited by a ruthless money-lender have no rights as an Indian citizen? In the glamorous world of  a TV studio, large parts of  this country have literally become areas of  darkness. We report from vast states  like Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, for example, only when there is a Naxal attack and a dozen policemen are killed in an ambush. And even then, we will reduce a serious and complex issue to a shrill studio black and white false binary debate: either you are with the Indian state or else you must be targeted as an ‘anti-national’ leftist who is hand in glove with Maoists/terrorists.

Truth is, we must have zero tolerance to all forms of  violence, be it state-sponsored, or driven by any form of  extreme ideologies. What if  I speak out against both Maoists and an oppressive state? What if I challenge both Islamist terror and Hindutva lynch mobs? What if I expose the failures of  the Congress government in the 1984 anti-Sikh pogrom and that of  a BJP government in the 2002 Gujarat riots? Human rights are universal, they cannot be trapped in a partisan and polarized debate designed to simplify the narrative into a dangerous ‘them’ versus ‘us’ divide. It is in the uncompromising resistance to any extremism and violence  that we must all stand up to be counted as citizens for peace and justice.

Rajdeep Sardesai is a senior journalist and author.



  1. We’re did not notice any difference in our school and college days or in our daily chores in business.
    But only the politicians, religious leaders complain of discrimination, lack of opportunity etc instead of rectifying. Further they put the blame onBJP & Sangh. This is where problem arise and they do react. Also the provocative comments by people manmohamsingh,actors (Shabna) . Forward caste people are denied seats I spite of Merritt as policy because of things cited as happened in the past some 1000s of years back. But when it comes to recent rulers since 1500 they seek reservation,minority TAG .A fine eg. is complete silence of people of secular, free speach propagandist, no restriction on anything canvassers on the happenings in kannur and threatening slogans in Kannur Processations (Kerala) .But at the same time jump and make hue & cry for statements of others . Don’t they have freedom of expression. Can continue

  2. I agree with the fact that state sponsored violence has to be censored. I feel that the present trend has been started by politicians for their personal Gains. The closure of this attitude appears to be very difficult. The aam Aadmi has now been conditioned to fanatically take sides totally losing their self thinking prowess. If the TV studios start educating the masses, instead of blindly chasing TRP’s change may come about in few years, may be a decade.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Go to Top